J Respir Med Lung Dis | Volume 2, Issue 1 | Research Article | Open Access
Asmita A Mehta* and Amit Satish Gupta
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, India
*Correspondance to: Asmita A Mehta
Fulltext PDFThoracostomy tubes are a mainstay of treatment for removing fluid or air from the pleural space. Placement of a chest tube is, however, an invasive procedure with potential morbidity. In an effort to reduce these complications, the use of percutaneous pigtail catheters in place of traditional largebore tubes for thoracostomy and pleural drainage has been described.Aim: To determine the role of pigtail catheters in adult population for drainage of pleural effusion.Methods: It was an observational study. All consecutive patients with pleural effusion requiring drainage were subjected to either tube thoracostomy or pig tail drainage. A clincial questionnaire was prepared for retrieving data. Outcomes of interest were time to drain and total duration of hospital stay.Results: A total of 92 patients (71men and 21women; age range, 17-86 years; mean age, 54±15 years) were enrolled into the study. Thirty five patients were treated with traditional chest tubes, whereas 57patients were treated with pigtail catheters. There were no significant differences in either drainage days or hospitalization days between the chest tube group and pigtail catheter group (9.81± 6 vs. 9±5.6; 13.8±6 vs. 13 ± 5.7).Conclusion: The pigtail catheter offers reliable treatment of effusions and is a safe and less invasive alternative to tube thoracostomy. There was no significant difference in time to drain duration of hospital stay in both the groups.
Pleural effusion; Tube thoracostomy; Pigtail catheter
Mehta AA, Gupta AS. The Pigtail Catheter for Pleural Drainage: A Less Invasive Alternative to Tube Thoracostomy. J Respir Med Lung Dis. 2017; 2(1): 1009.