Editorial

Use of Advanced Imaging Techniques in Differential Diagnosis of Periapical Lesions

Elif Şener*
Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Ege University, School of Dentistry,Izmir,Turkey


*Corresponding author: Elif Şener, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Ege University Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir, Turkey


Published: 22 Sep, 2017
Cite this article as: Şener E. Use of Advanced Imaging Techniques in Differential Diagnosis of Periapical Lesions. J Dent Oral Biol. 2017; 2(16): 1096.

Editorial

Radiographs play a vital role in endodontics, particularly for detection, treatment planning and follow up of periapical bone lesions. However, two-dimensional radiographs cannot discriminate presence of each periapical lesion and they cannot able to define the true size of a lesion [1]. It was proved that in comparison to two-dimensional images, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) can be a powerful tool in diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up endodontic treatment [2]. Even though there is an increasing trend toward the use of cbct in endodontic practice, it is not possible to predict the nature of the lesion with this imaging modality. Accordingly, the differentation of cystic and non cystic lesions could not be made which may change the total treatment plan. In addition, radiation dose to the patients should always be considered before prescription of each imaging modality. Thus, it is important to evaluate and consider different imaging methods for both the detection of periapical lesions and for prognosis of management. Recent developments in imaging sciences have enabled dental researchers to visualize structural and biophysical changes effectively [3]. Alternative imaging modalities such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), radionuclide imaging and Ultrasonography (US) are used to diagnose and manage pathologic conditions of the jaws as well as early detection of physiological changes in periapical region. At this point, US is an easy and reproducible technique that has an advantage over CT scans because no ionizing radiations are used. Recent studies showed that it has the potential to supplement conventional radiography in the diagnosis and follow-up of extensive periapical lesions [4]. This alternative imaging modality may also help to make a differential diagnosis between cysts and granulomas by revealing the nature of the content of a bony lesion. Besides, doppler flowmetry option provides information regarding the presence, direction, and velocity of blood flow within the lesion that may become an important factor when making a differential diagnosis between lesions of endodontic origin (i.e., granulomas versus cysts) and also between other lesions of the maxillary bones [5]. The results of the future studies will probably increase its usage and predict a future research field in differential diagnoses of bone lesions of dental origin in the jaws.


References

  1. Cotti E, Campisi G, Garau V, Puddu G. A new technique for the study of periapical bone lesions: ultrasound real time imaging. Int Endod J. 2002;35(2):148-52.
  2. Sandhu SS, Singh S, Arora S, Sandhu AK, Dhingra R. Comparative evaluation of advanced and conventional diagnostic AIDS for endodontic management of periapical lesions, an in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(1):ZC01-4.
  3. Aggarwal V, Logani A, Shah N. The evaluation of computed tomography scans and ultrasounds in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1312-5.
  4. Simon JH, Enciso R, Malfaz JM, Roges R, Bailey-Perry M, Patel A. Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using conebeam computed tomography measurements and biopsy. J Endod. 2006;32(9):833-7.
  5. Gundappa M, Suk NG, Whaites EJ. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:326-33.