Clin Pediatr | Volume 2, Issue 1 | Review Article | Open Access
Otto E Rossler1*, Lisa-Ruth Vial1, Frank Kuske1, August Nitschke2, Takashi Ikegami3 and Andrei Ujica4
1Department of Science, University of Tübingen, Germany
2Department of Humanities, University of Tübingen, Germany
3Department of Multi-Disciplinary Science, University of Tokyo, Japan
4University of Design HfG, Karlsruhe, Germany
*Correspondance to: Otto E Rossler
Fulltext PDFThe deductive mathematical theory of the brain equation of 1974 is put into an applied perspective. The equation is intuitively shown to be able to explain also the central ontogenetic phenomenon of “personogenesis”. Specifically, an interactional “dynamical function change” in the sense of Robert Rosen can occur between two coupled brain equations. This finding puts “persons” in the sense of Immanuel Kant into a class of dynamical systems of its own. If two brain equations are coupled in a certain symmetric fashion, then either partner system can suddenly see the other as actively pursuing its, the first’s, own goals. This mechanism allows for a causal understanding of the sudden shedding of “physiological autism” in early childhood. The human condition and its place in the cosmos can thereby be understood at long last. The original motivation for the theory was the presentation of a causal therapy of early childhood autism in1975 in San Diego. As a consequence, “smile-blindness” – a mere sensory defect regarding the usual bonding effect of the smile – suffices for a functional explanation of this debilitating medical syndrome. Autism then is non-pathological. The proposed “smile-laughter theory” by implication suffices for a causal therapy. The therapy is so simple that it can actually be extended to other intelligences capable of bonding – even if they reside in radically different biological bodies. This daring proposal will, once it is empirically confirmed, put an end to the five decades long reluctance of the medical profession to apply the causal therapy of autism to human children. The offered scientific “child theory” started out with the historical Jesus’ first full understanding the heart of a child and was eventually continued by Pestalozzi, Fröbel, Martin Buber, René Spitz and, most recently, Klaus Giel. The workings of the mind of a young child are still totally under-investigated. The predicted sudden occurrence, in the playroom, of the “personogenetic bifurcation” has apparently never been documented on the web amongst the plethora of early-childhood video clips. But because there is no single more deeply heart-moving (“holy”) event on the planet if the offered child theory indeed holds water, it is not surprising that this ontogenetic transition was apparently never documented on video given the natural tactfulness of the human heart. The recently proposed “elephant model” will, if successful, enable human society to understand and respect its own essence for the first time. The lack of this very knowledge in society explains the empirical acceptance, up to this day, of the satanic curse of warfare (“collective autism”), as first adopted in the wake of the invention of agriculture about 11 millennia ago. Humankind’s lack of knowledge about what constitutes its heart can be healed. The current risk of planetary self-annihilation (naively adopted at CERN) cannot be continued any more once the superior mind of the “first persons” – the toddlers – is appreciated by the scientific community.
Brain equation; Personogenesis; Causal therapy of autism; Child theory; Talking elephant; CERN; Szilamandee
Rossler OE, Vial L-R, Kuske F, Nitschke A, Ikegami T, Ujica A. Brain Equation and Personogenesis. Clin Pediatri. 2019; 2: 1011.